Simon Kaltenrieder

Exploring the archaeology of us

When imagining archaeological research, most people conjure mental images that come right out of National Geographic magazine:  archaeologists painstakingly excavating artifacts left behind by some ancient and exotic culture.  But archaeology is not so much a cohesive field of study focused on any one culture or time as it is a series of concepts and tools that allow for reasonable inferences to be made about human behaviour based on physical remains.  As such, archaeology is not limited to the study of ancient cultures, or even to the past. 

Consider the evolving archaeological study of modern garbage.  While archaeologists have always studied refuse, the formal archaeological study of recent trash—the messy, smelly, partly-decayed mountains of household garbage and food waste that we all contribute to via our trash collection and landfill systems—is relatively new.  Professor William Rathje of the University of Arizona, who pioneered the archaeology of garbage in the 1970s and 1980s, coined the term ‘garbology’ for this subfield of archaeology.

Rathje’s work began with the study of garbage left for pick-up in curbside garbage cans in Tucson, Arizona.  Rathje and his students sorted, classified and quantified what the residents of Tucson were discarding.  The best-known results of this study pertain to alcohol consumption:  the analysis of household garbage indicated that the residents of Tucson consumed substantially more alcohol than they were willing to admit to in questionnaires or in-person interviews.  This work also investigated the degree to which people waste food, and showed, counterintuitively, that in difficult economic times, people tend to waste more food.  Rathje inferred that when money is tight, people tend to purchase certain foods—particularly meat—in larger quantities when they find it on sale, only to fail to consume it all before its best-before date, thereby resulting in an increase in wasted food. 

After this promising start, Rathje and his team turned their attention to garbage dumps themselves.  They investigated more than a dozen of them across North America.  They excavated deep test holes into garbage dumps, just as one might excavate test units into any archaeological site. 

The archaeological investigation of garbage dumps allowed for the quantification of what kinds of trash predominate in landfills.  Survey data showed that Americans commonly believed garbage dumps to be dominated by fast food refuse, Styrofoam packaging, and disposable diapers.  Instead, the garbologists found that these items constitute a small fraction of the total volume of refuse in landfills—typically less than five percent.  Instead, landfills were found to be dominated by plastic and paper garbage and industrial and construction debris, which accounted for more than three quarters of all garbage.

These studies also revealed problems with how landfills are designed and operated.  Garbage at landfills was typically crushed and compacted and then buried.  The garbologists discovered that, as  a result, items that were assumed to degrade in landfills—food waste and paper products in particular—were not degrading as anticipated.  Decades old newspapers were still quite readable.  Food waste was often surprisingly  intact and recognizable, despite the intervening decades since it was discarded. 

These two sets of observations about landfills yielded insights that have affected public policy and planning around how we manage the wastes we produce.  Recycling programs have significantly reduced the amount of paper and plastic entering landfills.  And modern landfills are designed to ensure that organic wastes do biodegrade, and that the resulting gasses are properly and safely vented. 

Most archaeological studies fail to affect public attitudes and perceptions or to inform public policy—in that regard the work of the garbologists is an unqualified success.  The work of Professor Rathje and his colleagues has been well-covered in the mainstream press, including articles in magazines like Time, the Atlantic, and yes, even National Geographic.  Rathje’s excellent 2001 book “Rubbish: The Archaeology of Garbage”, is available in bookstores.

The patience and focus of an archaeologist

When I meet new people, they are usually surprised to learn that I am an archaeologist.  This surprise typically turns into curiosity—one of the questions I’m commonly asked, is “OK, so what do you actually do?”

Most archaeologists in BC, and indeed all of the contributors to this column, work in the cultural resource management industry.  Cultural resource management—usually shortened to ‘CRM’—is the work conducted by archaeologists and others to navigate the complex and often confusing array of legislation, rules, and bureaucracy that protect archaeological sites, while working to find ways to facilitate the developments proposed by our clients.  Our clients may be anyone whose work has the potential to damage or destroy BC’s archaeological heritage, but we most commonly work in the forestry, mining, transportation and energy sectors.  Hundreds of British Columbians are employed in CRM, and many more people work in CRM across Canada. 

The Archaeology Branch works to oversee archaeological research in BC, and to enforce the Heritage Conservation Act. CRM archaeologists are guided by the rules, regulations and policies established by the Archeology Branch.  Indeed, we cannot conduct most kinds of archaeological work without a permit from the Archaeology Branch.

The Branch also works with proponents to ensure their developments don’t violate the Act, by working with developers, CRM archaeologists and First Nations to develop a plan to mitigate damage to archaeological sites when conflicts between development and archaeological resources cannot be avoided. In these circumstances, developers require a special permit from the Branch called a Site Alteration Permit.

As the name implies, Site Alteration Permits allow a specific development to proceed in a manner that alters the archaeological site or sites in conflict with it.  These permits absolve developers of the consequences of illegal site destruction but include a variety of conditions relating to how the development can proceed.  Typically, these permits require two related things:  modified construction techniques, and archaeological monitoring.

Archaeological monitoring involves carefully and systematically watching construction excavations so that work can be paused when archaeological materials are encountered.  It usually involves screening or raking through the displaced sediments to look for artifacts.  And if significant discoveries are made, work is paused while the archaeology crew dig excavation units by hand to collect related data, artifacts and samples.

We do a LOT of archaeological monitoring. Because we work in proximity to heavy machinery like excavator, backhoes and graders, this work requires full PPE.  Its often very dusty and very hot.  And when you`re not finding much, it can be repetitive and boring.  But every now and then we discover something significant, or unanticipated, and then it’s all worth while.  We jump into high gear, excavating units, collecting artifacts and samples, and work hard to gather good data while not subjecting our projects to undue delays.

Many projects around Kamloops have included CRM archaeologists monitoring construction.  These include upgrades to Highway 1 east of town, and the Victoria Street West improvement project in our downtown.  The Victoria Street West project made the news when the archaeological monitors working there discovered prehistoric human remains during construction excavations last summer.  Because the project included archaeological monitors, and because protocols regarding the discovery of archaeological resources, including human remains, had been established ahead of the project, this situation was managed in a manner that was consistent with the Heritage Conservation Act,  was respectful of Tk’emlups te Secwepemc concerns, and did not result in significant project delays.

The next time you drive past a construction project and you see folks in hard hats and high-viz vests who look like they’re just standing around, you may in fact be witnessing the laser-like focus of a local CRM archaeologist, as he or she monitors the construction excavations going on around them.

Keeping sites secret for a good reason

In a recent edition of Dig It, my colleague Joanne Hammond discussed the presence of a very significant concentration of archaeological sites in and around Kamloops and how these sites pertain to the occupation of the region since the last Ice Age by Secwepemc people (“The Proof is Under the Pavement,” July 24, 2019).

Her article was accompanied by a single photo of the South Thompson river valley, overlain with red circles and ovals.

These polygons represent archeological sites and her intent was to illustrate their ubiquity in our city, often buried just out if sight, in locations both predictable and surprising.

To any B.C. archeologist, these red polygons would be immediately recognizable.

In British Columbia, the protection and management of archeological sites is the responsibility of the Archaeology Branch — an office of the Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development.

The Archaeology Branch has a variety of roles, but two of the most important relate to the issuance of permits and maintenance of a provincial registry of recorded archaeological sites.

This registry is accessed by archeologists through an on-line portal called RAAD (that is, Remote Access to Archaeological Data).

On RAAD, archeological sites are represented by red polygons.

RAAD is maintained by the Inventory Section of the Archaeology Branch. It maintains the provincial registry, which contains records for each of the more than 50,000 recorded sites in the province.

When an archeologist discovers a previously unrecorded archeological site, or revisits a recorded one, they are required to submit a B.C. archeological site inventory form.

Site forms contain a variety of information that archeologists collect when they record archeological sites.

This includes everything from basic location information and related maps to summary data regarding the age and functions of a site, its environmental context, condition and significance.

Together, these site forms comprise an inventory of archeological sites, which can then be accessed through RAAD.

Access to RAAD is limited to professional archeologists who require data about previous archeological studies and other eligible professionals who require information about archeological sites for land-use planning or development approvals processes. The information on RAAD is not available to the general public.

As the Archaeology Branch website explains, RAAD access is tightly controlled because of “the sensitive nature of archeological sites.”

Why is access to archeological site data limited and controlled?

The secrecy around archeological sites and their locations is intended to help protect sites from damage by pothunters.

A pothunter is an amateur artifact collector who lack the formal training of professional archeologists.

They collect artifacts from sites without the requisite permits and without recording the types of observations of their discoveries, which would allow archeologists to make reasoned inferences about past human behaviour.

Moreover, they often target the kinds of artifacts that would otherwise be most useful to archeologists: artifacts diagnostic of particular time periods or particular activities, such as: stone arrowheads, dart points, spearheads and knives.

Also, pothunters often dig pits into sites in their quest for artifacts, obliterating the context and associations of their finds.

This reduces the historical importance of the artifact from that of one piece within a prehistoric puzzle to that of mere curio.

At its worst, pothunting occurs at an industrial scale, with artifacts at times offered for sale online.

Collecting artifacts from archeological sites without a permit from the Archaeology Branch is illegal, as it violates the B.C. Heritage Conservation Act.

Pothunters may be subject to a fine or even imprisonment under the terms of the Act.

In a sense, pothunters are the frenemies of archeologists.

Their hobby damages archeological sites and limits the information potential for archeologists.

Yet, having an interest in artifacts and what those artifacts represent is commendable. It’s the same curiosity about the past, which motivates archeologists, after all.

If you’re a pothunter, please leave the artifacts you find where you find them and instead share your discoveries with the professional archeological community.

Your interest and passion for artifacts is understandable. Consider joining the recently formed Kamloops chapter of the Archaeological Society of B.C. (ASBC)

More information about the ASBC is available online at asbc.ca.

If you’re considering buying, selling or developing a property, and you are interested in knowing whether there is a recorded archeological site on that property, you can request the information from the Archaeology Branch through their website at archdatarequest.nrs.gov.bc.ca/. Realtors may also obtain this information for properties, which they list for sale.

A British Columbia archaeology primer

The 2017 British Columbia Archaeology Forum is being held in Kamloops on Saturday, November 18th.  This is an annual event that allows archaeologists, academics, First Nations, government representatives, and the interested public to come together and discuss current archaeological issues and research. The Forum is hosted by the Secwepemc Museum and Heritage Park and will be held at Moccasin Square Gardens at Tk’emlups te Secwepemc (Kamloops Indian Band). 

In anticipation of this event, I present the following BC Archaeology Primer.

Archaeology is the study of past human cultures through the analysis of the physical remains of those cultures.  But what do archaeologists in BC do?  And why? 

1.    An archaeological site is any location where these material cultural remains are identified.  Archaeological sites in BC range in size and complexity from a single discarded tool to the remains of entire villages.

2.    Archaeological sites are more common than you might think:  Almost 50,000 have been formally recorded in British Columbia.  These sites represent at least 14,000 years of First Nations history.

3.    The Kamloops area has been a focus of human habitation and activity for millennia.  There are more than 250 recorded archaeological sites within ten kilometers of the downtown core of Kamloops—and many more in the region.

4.    Archaeology involves a variety of approaches and techniques for investigating the past.  Many of these are borrowed from related fields, including anthropology, history, geology and ecology.

5.    Because First Nations people have lived here for so much longer than the rest of us, most archaeological research in BC is focused on First Nations cultural history.  But archaeology is also employed to study the non-aboriginal history of BC. For example, archaeological research has focused on gold rush sites, World War II Japanese internment camps, and early fish canneries.

6.    Archaeological sites in BC are legally protected by the Heritage Conservation Act.  It is overseen by the Archaeology Branch of the Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development.  The Act legally protects archaeological sites from alterations of any kind. The provisions of the Act apply to both public and private land, and it is binding on government.

7.    The Heritage Conservation Act automatically protects most archaeological sites if they are known or can be inferred to pre-date AD 1846, or if they contain human remains or aboriginal rock art of historical or archaeological value, regardless of age.  The Act also protects shipwrecks or airplane wrecks that are two or more years old.  The Act can also protect archaeological sites through formal agreement with First Nations, or by their formal designation as Provincial heritage sites. 

8.    The Archaeology Branch maintains an inventory of recorded archaeological sites and issues and oversees a permitting process.  Archaeologists must obtain permits to conduct their fieldwork.  These permits define the goals and methods of our archaeological studies, and confirm which repository will ultimately store and curate the artifacts and samples we collect (No, we archaeologists don’t get to keep the artifacts!).  The Archaeology Branch provide a variety of information and guidance for developers and for the public on their website: for.gov.bc.ca/archaeology/index.htm.

9.    There are archaeologists affiliated with most universities and colleges in BC.  However, most archaeological research in BC is conducted not by academic archaeologists but by archaeologists employed in the field of Cultural Resource Management (CRM).  CRM archaeologists conduct applied research focussed on avoiding or mitigating the impacts of developments on archaeological sites.

10.  Archaeological and heritage sites are commonly addressed in provincial and federal Environmental Assessments.  The management of archaeological concerns is built into the planning processes in the forestry and mining industries and in the transportation sector.

11.  Interested members of the public are invited to join the Archaeological Society of British Columbia.  The ASBC has been educating British Columbians about archaeology since 1966!  Members receive The Midden, an illustrated journal that has long been a cornerstone of BC archaeology.  The ASBC’s website is  asbc.bc.ca/

12.  In Kamloops, the Secwepemc Museum and Heritage Park offers a variety of displays focussed on Secwepemc culture and history, including extensive archaeological displays, and several recreated traditional dwellings and food processing features.  Group interpretive tours are available.  More information is available at tkemlups.ca/museum-heritage-park/.

13.  The Kamloops Museum and Archives documents many aspects of the cultural history of our town and our region, including Secwepemc history and local archaeology.  Their website is kamloops.ca/museum/index.shtml.

14.  Archaeologists in British Columbia have their own professional association, the BC Association of Professional Archaeologists.  It currently has about 230 members.  CRM archaeologists who are Professional Members are entitled to call themselves Registered Professional Consulting Archaeologists.  The Association’s website is bcapa.ca/.

And it stoned them to their souls

In our last column, Nola Markey and Brian Finlay discussed stone tools collected from the shores of Little Shuswap Lake. This collection included some tool types about which readers may already be familiar: arrowheads, spear points and scrapers. Why do archeologists seem preoccupied with stone tools?

Stone tools are ubiquitous in the archeological sites in our region. First Nations peoples made a great variety of tools and equipment out of wood, bark, tree roots, mammal bones and antlers and many other organic materials.

But many of the things people made in the past do not preserve well under most conditions. Commonly, organic artifacts decay in the ground, so what’s left for us to find? Stone tools. Archeologists rely on stone tools to understand the pre-contact life of First Nations in the Kamloops area and beyond. The study of stone tools has been a fundamental part of the archeology of the B.C. Interior for over a century.

Making tools from stone is difficult (I know, I’ve tried). You can’t make anything out of most kinds of stone (I’ve tried that, too). Only specific kinds of stone share the physical properties that allow them to be predictably shaped into usable tools.

First Nations peoples in our region have known for many thousands of years where to acquire the best tool stones. One especially important source is located near Cache Creek, in the aptly named Arrowstone Hills. Pebbles and cobbles of dacite, a fine-grained volcanic rock, were collected on a massive scale across an area of at least 100 square kilometres. Hand-dug pre-contact mining pits, still visible in parts of the site, testify to the importance and intensity of use of this resource. This prehistoric quarry was used for millennia.

One of the challenges in the regional trade in tool stones was their weight. To keep loads manageable, people with access to tool stone sources would complete the preliminary preparation and shaping of stones into what archeologists call “blanks,” creating lighter and standardized trade items. These could be manufactured into a variety of different tools by their eventual owner.

Archeologists have used a variety of techniques to match the artifacts they find to particular tool stone sources. The recent development of portable X-ray fluorescence devices has allowed archeologists to confirm the geochemical fingerprint of both tool stone sources and artifacts and has led to a renewed interest in this kind of study.

Archeological research shows the high-quality dacite tool stone collected and quarried from near Cache Creek was traded across the region and beyond — and this trade persisted over thousands of years. First Nations communities established an interconnected series of pedestrian trails and canoe routes that facilitated regional trade. These trade networks allowed access to important resources that were not locally available.

Regional trade and exchange helped maintain social connections forged through kinship and marriage. Recent archeological excavations near Vancouver confirmed that Cache Creek dacite was traded down the Thompson and Fraser rivers all the way to the coast 5,000 years ago.

So, if you discover stone tools while you enjoy the outdoors around Kamloops, please don’t collect them. Instead, consider that what you’ve found represents a very rare resource, a tool stone collected and carefully curated and traded across dozens or hundreds of kilometres.

All that before it was carefully crafted into the tools you’ve discovered.